Showing posts with label Steroid Era. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steroid Era. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

MLB: How will Hall of Fame Voters Treat the Class of 2013



Before former Cincinnati Reds shortstop Barry Larkin’s Hall of Fame plaque could be ordered on Monday talk had already turned to the 2013 class of eligible players but for all the wrong reasons.

Between 1984 and 2007 the names Biggio, Piazza, Bonds, Schilling, Sosa, and Clemens were synonymous with greatness. There was also a period of time when a few of these names were linked to performance enhancing drugs thus tarnishing America’s Past Time in the wake of their indelible mark on baseball.  

On statistics and accomplishments alone the first-time eligible players for the 2013 National Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York could be considered the greatest class inducted since Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb, Christy Mathewson, Honus Wagner, and Walter Johnson entered in 1936. But because of the “Steroid Era” question marks hover over some of the games’ greatest players.

Barry Bonds
In 2003 Barry Bonds was caught in the BALCO scandal. For those that may have forgotten what the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative scandal was about, it was about Greg Anderson allegedly providing steroids or performance enhancing drugs to athletes and Major League Baseball players. One of his most successful clients was Bonds.

Stemming from Bonds’ now infamous testimony, he was charged with perjury and obstruction of justice in 2007 cutting a legendary 22 year career short; there was some gas left in Bonds’ tank.

There was also a desire by the Home Run King to keep playing but the controversy surrounding Bonds’ proved to be too much negative attention for any team to bear and understandably so.  

Bonds finished his career as the all-time home run leader with 762, the leader in walks with 2,558, and intentional walks recording 688. He has the single season home run record (73), most consecutive seasons with 30 or more home runs (13), on-base percentage in a single season (.609), and he is tied with his father for the most 30-30 seasons in a career (5).

If those accomplishments are not enough, he won seven National League MVP awards including four in a row (1990, 1992, 1993, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004).

If one is looking for holes to poke in Bonds career- good luck. He was 65 hits shy of 3,000 and a career .298 hitter. His career average is tied with Mickey Mantle and Jim Rice and places him ahead of newly elected Hall of Famer Barry Larkin (.2948) and soon to be first ballot Hall of Famer Ken Griffey Jr. (.284).

He retired No. 4 on the all-time runs batted in list with 1,996.

Did he admit to using the “cream and the clear” ointment from Greg Anderson or did he not? Speculation still surrounds this possible forthcoming information from Bonds.

Will his conviction of obstruction of justice charge on April 13, 2011 be enough to keep voters away from one of the most feared hitters to ever play the game?


Sammy Sosa
Sammy Sosa is another player implicated during his playing career but never formally found guilty of failing a drug test. How will the election committee view his career?

At the time of his retirement Sosa was one of five players with 600 home runs; 500 home runs at one time were considered the magical benchmark needed to make into the Hall of Fame. He won the 1998 National League MVP and was a seven-time All-Star in his 18 year career.

Sosa twice led the league in home runs but oddly never during any of his 60 plus home run seasons- 1998, 1999, and 2001. He led the league in 2000 with 50 and in 2002 with 49.

His career batting average of .273 is average for power hitters and his 1,667 RBIs currently rank him No. 27 on the all-time list. When he retired he was in the Top 100 on the career hit list with 2,408 placing him ahead of Hall of Famers Ryne Sandberg, Larkin, Kirby Puckett, and Joe DiMaggio.

He led the NL in runs three times (1998, 2001, and 2002), home runs twice, RBIs twice (1998 and 2001), and total bases three times (1998, 1999, and 2001).

In 2009 the New York Times reported that Sosa failed a drug test in 2003. Also in 2003 Sosa was found corking his bat- an illegal action in MLB.

Slammin’ Sammy was also part of the Grand Jury that testified before Congress in 2005 regarding steroids in baseball. Sosa did not directly testify claiming he did not speak English well enough to do so.

Mike Piazza
Mike Piazza is typically regarded as one of the best hitting catchers of all-time. His 396 career home runs as a catcher is tops in MLB history. A .308 hitter during16 years in the majors ranks him No. 120 for career average.

Piazza was the 1993 NL Rookie of the Year as the Dodgers catcher. He was with the Dodgers until 1998 then traded to the Marlins before being traded again to the New York Mets. Piazza had better overall career numbers as a Met but earned his reputation as a hitter in Dodger Stadium, a pitcher’s park.

Post season numbers do not support his place among the best players ever. In eight series played over five seasons, a total of 32 games, he hit .242.

As a defensive catcher he allowed over 100 stolen bases eight times topping out with 155 in 1996. 23 percent of bases runners were caught stealing by the lumbering catcher and 10 times he allowed the most bases stolen in the NL.

In 1995 and 1996 he led the league in passed balls- 12 and 12. Four times he led all catchers in errors (1993, 1994, 1997, and 2002). Five other times he was in the top 2-4 in total errors for a season among catchers.

The most surprising statistics of Piazza’s may be that he had eight triples in his career and 17 stolen bases.

Whispers of PED surrounded Piazza but he was never openly found to violate the league’s substance abuse policy.

Chances are Piazza makes it into the Hall in one of his first two attempts unless documentation surfaces about him taking performance enhancing drugs before the election committee submits their votes.

A question begs to be asked, if Piazza was not a catcher would his career numbers be good enough for the Hall of Fame?

The follow up question to voters, because a guy is an above average hitter for his position but a below average player in the field, does that merit a Hall of Fame career?

Craig Biggio
Craig Biggio came up through the Houston Astros organization as a catcher but will be remembered by most as a second baseman. Biggio’s rare athletic ability allowed him to play parts of five seasons behind the plate, parts of five seasons in center field, six in left field, and 15 at second base.

In 20 total seasons he was named a NL All-Star seven times, once as a catcher, and a Gold Glove Award winner at second base five times (1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997). He was nine home runs shy of joining Willie Mays as the only other player with 3,000 hits, 300 stolen bases, and 300 home runs.

Biggio’s true power shows in his career doubles. He retired with 668 doubles, fifth all-time, and tops for a right handed batter. A testament to his speed on the base paths as well.

A dubious honor but one that counts towards his on base percentage is his hit by a pitch stat line. He was hit 285 times leaving him two short of Hughie Jennings (1891-1918). Five times he led the league in HBP being hit 34 times in 1997.

At second, Biggio had great range which contributed to his high error totals. Seven times he was among the top five in errors but never led the league. His effort in the field paid off as he was first in putouts five times and in the top five six other times.

He totaled 3,060 career hits (No. 21 on the career list) with 1,844 runs scored (No. 13 all-time).

Biggio was a gamer and deserves a spot among the best ever. Voters will overlook his career .281 batting average and his career post season average of .234.

Curt Schilling
If the election committee took into account a player’s birth place then Curt Schilling may get inducted as the best Major League pitcher ever born in the state of Alaska. As it is Schilling is on a dangerous Hall of Fame line after compiling 216 career wins, well short of the mythical 300 needed by most starting pitchers.

Schilling may fall into the Jack Morris area among voters. Morris was a three-time World Series winner and a World Series MVP like Schilling. However Morris won 38 more games over his 18 year big league career than the 20 years Schilling played.

Known as a strike out pitcher utilizing his four-seam fastball with a great changeup and a devastating split-finger fastball, Schilling was also a workhorse on the mound twice leading the NL in innings pitched- 1998 Phillies and 2001 Diamondbacks. Twice he led the NL in total strikeouts (1997 and 1998) placing him No. 15 on the career list.

The post season is where one wants to shine and that is exactly where Schilling shined. He and his bloody sock won 11 games while only losing two over 19 starts. He was not bailed out by his offense either. He posted a 2.23 ERA over 133.1 post season innings pitched.

Schilling may have to wait around a few years if he is ever inducted into the Hall.

He led the NL once in wins with 22 in 2001 with Diamondbacks and once in the AL with the Red Sox posting 21 wins. He went over 20 wins a total of three times in his career.

He was known as a good to great pitcher but never known as the most dominate of his era or even during any one season most notably because he never won a Cy Young Award.

Speculation with steroids was never a problem for Schilling, his conflicts with management, players, and the media made him a notorious player during his career.

Should a starting pitcher during the steroid era get extra consideration for the Hall of Fame because of the gaudy offensive numbers compiled during that time?

Roger Clemens
Love him or hate him Roger Clemens is among the best pitchers to ever play in Major League Baseball.

The Rocket spent 13 of his 24 years in a Red Sox uniform winning 192 games with a winning percentage of .634 over that time. After four subpar seasons in Boston which saw him accumulate a record of 40 wins and 39 losses including the only two losing seasons of his career, he reinvented himself in Toronto in 1997.

Over the following 11 years Clemens won 162 games losing 73 times for the Toronto Blue Jays, New York Yankees, and the Houston Astros. He added four more Cy Young Awards to his mantle during this time collecting a total of seven through his time in “the show”.

Here are a few of the Rocket’s career accomplishments: four times he led his league in wins, seven times led the league in ERA, 16 years of 30 or more starts, 6 times led the league in shutouts, five time leader in strikeouts, and twice led the league in innings pitched.

It’s hard enough to win seven Cy Young Awards (1986, 1987, 1991, 1997, 1998, 2001, and 2004) much less to be named the league MVP as a pitcher, something Clemens accomplished in 1986.

He was also an 11 time All-Star and won two World Series with the Yankees in 1999 and 2000.

He ranks No. 3 on the career strikeout list with 4,672, No. 9 with 354 total wins, No. 16 in career innings pitched (4,916.2), and No. 26 in career shutouts (46) with 118 complete games.

Clemens was named to the Mitchell Report citing that he had used steroids or was connected to performance enhancing drugs. The Rocket denied his use of steroids. He was later charged with six felony counts including perjury, false statements, and obstruction of Congress.

July 14, 2011, on the second day of testimony his trial was declared a mistrial because of prosecutorial misconduct. A retrial date has not been set.

The jury literally is still out on Clemens and his usage of PED. The most important question is how will the Hall of Fame voters treat one of the best pitchers to ever take the mound?

Is speculation of steroid use enough to keep Clemens from the Hall of Fame?

Are his accomplishments before the steroid era enough to vote him into the Hall?


The Outcome
Six players worthy of Hall of Fame consideration await their fate. Will they receive the ultimate honor bestowed to the greatest players of the game by being elected or will the steroid era taint the accomplishments of all six players that will be eligible for the first time in 2013?

If you had a vote, which players would you elect to the Hall of Fame in 2013?


What would you like to clarify? Don't forget to sign up for email notifications and as a reader/follower. Follow HogManInLA on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/HogManInLa

Friday, June 10, 2011

What’s Wrong with Major League Baseball?

What did the steroid era do to fans of Major League Baseball? Skepticism of current MLB players still using performance enhancing drugs aside (Jose Bautista?), the steroid era has seemingly left a void in professional baseball. Are the current players meeting the expectations of their fans? Will baseball ever recover? Will the fans ever recover?

When spring rolled around this year, friends began emailing and calling about the upcoming MLB season. Talk about fantasy baseball drafts, predications on who will win their division, wild card teams, and general excitement about catching a game ensued. Who will dominate this year? Will MLB have a 20 game winner or a Triple Crown winner? How many home runs will lead the league and who will be the league leader? Excitement began to bubble then the most thought provoking question about the upcoming season was asked, “who do you want to see play this year”? The sad truth is no one.

Living in southern California can spoil you. Not because the Dodgers have been great for the past ten years and life as a baseball fan can’t get any better. Having access to two professional baseball teams within an hours drive is the spoiler; and the San Diego Padres just a couple of hours away. Taking the opportunity to see players and teams play for granted has become a part of life. You name the player chances are I’ve seen him play. Good for me, so what’s the point? My childhood dreams have come true, I finally have access to see any professional athlete or team play and I don’t really care. How can I take baseball, the first sport I loved, for granted. What happened?

What excuses can be made for a lack of interest about going to the ballpark for a dog, a cold one, and watching America’s past time? As we grow older we don’t make as much time for the things we did when we were kids? The cost of tickets and parking is too much? Traffic is horrible. Been there, done that? In 100 games attended not one foul ball or home run has been hit to me for a “free” souvenir. I’m self conscience about seeing “Take Me Out to The Ballgame”. The ten 21 year old kids on my row will keep making a beer run in the middle of the inning. Nah, all of those reasons seems too flimsy of an excuse. At the heart of the matter is a lack of enthusiasm for the players and teams in today’s game.

Now let’s ask the next round of important questions. Why is there little to no enthusiasm for baseball fans to rally around today’s players and teams? Is Major League Baseball to blame due to a lack of marketing the game and their players to their fans? Perhaps. Does MLB or ESPN highlight any other teams outside of the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox? No they don’t. It makes sense to highlight those two teams as they have combined to win 7 out of the last 15 World Series but that rivalry has gone stale… even to hardcore baseball fans.

Does there need to be a salary cap in MLB so every season a different team, in theory, has a legitimate chance to make the playoffs and possibly the World Series? A salary cap wouldn’t hurt. This would put an even larger emphasis on each team’s scouting, drafting, and farm systems; something that should be happening regardless. A notion lost on many teams (hello Chicago Cubs). Would this drive overall attendance and spark a flame in Major League Baseball again for the casual baseball fan? Definitely. Yet this would only mask part of the problem in baseball.

Bud Selig may dodge the salary cap solution and brining greater parity to baseball, which works in the NFL, by adding an additional wild card team to the playoffs; there is a possibility of two total Wild Card teams in the 2012 playoffs. Wild card teams do not mean punching bags for division winners. Since the wild card format was put into effect in 1995, 4 wild card teams have won the World Series:

1997 Florida Marlins
*2002 Anaheim Angels
2003 Florida Marlins
2004 Boston Red Sox

5 wild card teams have advanced to the World Series since 1995:

2000 Mets
*2002 San Francisco Giants
2005 Houston Astros
2006 Detroit Tigers
2007 Colorado Rockies

* In 2002 the Anaheim Angels and San Francisco Giants faced each other in the World Series.

Without conversations of baseball in December and reducing the total number of regular season games, this solution solves a temporary competitive balance in baseball; adding more teams to the party. Hopefully this restores the faith of fans for a couple small markets teams and gets them going to the ballpark again.

There’s still a perceived problem with the product on the field. Gone are the guys hitting 60 and 70 home run per year; for better or for worse. Even the 50 home run hitters are scarce. More small-ball you say? This is the new way of baseball for fans to get excited about. Since 2001 when Barry Bonds hit 73 home runs, only 3 players have stolen over 70 bases in a season: 2004 Scott Podsednik, 70, MIL, 2007 Jose Reyes, 78 NYM, 2009 Jacoby Ellsbury, 70, BOS. More sacrifice hits? The 2010 MLB leader was Dodger pitcher Clayton Kershaw with 18. In 2001 three players tied for the league lead with 17 (Tom Glavine, Jack Wilson, and Ricky Gutierrez). Okay, no excitement there, and seems not much has changed.

This must be the era of dominating pitching then.

2001 Randy Johnson (Arizona Diamondbacks) led the baseball with a 2.49 ERA. In 2010 Felix Hernandez (Seattle Mariners) led baseball with a 2.27 ERA. Not much of a difference. How about strikeouts per 9 innings? If the players are no longer hitting home runs they must be striking out. In 2001 Randy Johnson led baseball with an average of 13.41. Tim Lincecum had a league leading average of 9.791, a big drop off in the wrong direction. If real numbers work better for you, Randy Johnson struck out 372 batters in 2001, Lincecum lead the league last year with 231.

Hey HogManInLA, that’s not a fair comparison. Randy Johnson is one of the best pitchers of all-time.

Good point. There must be great talent then in MLB. Let’s look at the individual players.

The Sporting News recently released their 50 Best Players in Baseball article by Stan McNeil and Anthony Witardo. Their best player in baseball is Albert Pujols. Not much of an argument can be made against that pick. But their second best player is 26 year old, SS Troy Tulowitzki with the Colorado Rockies. TROY is the second best player in baseball? That says a lot. The second best player in baseball in 5 seasons has only hit over .300 once and has only hit over 30 home runs once; 37 in 2009. He has never knocked in over 100 runs in a season.

Was 27 year old Joey Votto, first baseman for the Cincinnati Reds and The Sporting News fourth best player, your pick for the second best player in baseball? He had a break-through season last year hitting .324, 37 home runs, and 113 RBIs; all career highs but he did not lead the league in any major statistical category. He’s a great young talent and worth seeing play in person but this is another pick based off hope and promise for the future. Maybe the article should have been called, “The 50 Greatest Players that will possibly emerge in the next couple of years”.

Either way this is a winning closing argument for the problem with baseball. There are no great players, other than Albert Pujols, to follow in baseball. Think I’m wrong? How many position players 30 years old and under look like they are on a Hall of Fame track?

Baseball has to admit they are in a void of talent and dampened enthusiasm since the steroid era, I mean the “power era” as MLB now refers to the 1990’s and 2000’s. If the individual talent is not there, MLB has to market their teams. Following the NBA’s marketing plan of hyping one or two teams per season will be the continued nail in the coffin for MLB.

Just to clarify, there are some amazing young and talented players currently in the game. Problem is we don’t know what we have with these young guys yet. Once they string 3-4 years together at a top level, then baseball fans have a reason to be excited. Major League Baseball must do a better job of marketing their players on a national level instead of letting individual teams market their players within their sphere of influence. Boston and the New York Yankees may be baseball’s two most important teams but they are killing the sport. Letting ESPN overhype their rivalry year after year is not helping either.

See them before they’re gone!

Here are a few older reasons to sip a beer, eat a dog, and remember the good old days at the park:

Derek Jeter, New York Yankees
Chipper Jones, Atlanta Braves
Jorge Posada, New York Yankees
Ichiro Suzuki, Seattle Mariners
Ivan Rodriguez, Washington Nationals
Lance Berkman, St. Louis Cardinals
Jim Thome, Minnesota Twins
Vladimir Guerrero, Baltimore Orioles
Jamie Moyer… oh yeah, never mind.

A question to The Sporting News:

Have you seen Adrian Gonzalez play? He’s in Boston now, so you should take notice. Few fans, because of poor marketing by MLB, know who Gonzalez is and realize how special of a player he will be for the Red Sox for years to come. He was tucked away in San Diego for the past 5 years with no one in the lineup to protect him still he was able to put up monster numbers in a pitcher’s park. Placing him #14 on your list raises serious doubts about your ability to assess major league talent.

Baseball fans, what do you think?


What would you like to clarify? Send me an email or post your comments.

Show us your avatar! Don't forget to sign up for email notifications and as a reader/follower.